Consumer Cases Pending
|
Apple iPod Nano Products Liability Litigation
Inphonic, Inc., Wireless Phone Rebate Litigation
Bowen, et al. v. Whirlpool Corp., et al.
Health Science Products LLC. v. Sage Software SB, Inc.
Imagitas, Inc., Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act Litigation
Donna Wiatrowski et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co at al
Oestreicher v. Alienware Corporation
Davis, et al. v. Dell, Inc.
Schweinfurth, et al. v. Motorola, Inc.
|
Meyer & Associates currently serves as putative Class Counsel in numerous pending consumer class actions throughout the country, including the following:
- In Re Apple iPod Nano Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. M: 06-cv-01754-RMW (N.D. Cal.) (The firm is Co-Lead Counsel in the Multi-District Litigation proceeding in which nationwide class actions allege that screens on Ipod Nanos were susceptible to excessive scratching under normal use and were therefore defective).
- In Re Inphonic, Inc., Wireless Phone Rebate Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1792 (D. D.C.) (The Meyer firm filed the first of several class actions against Inphonic, Inc. on behalf of consumers who failed to receive rebates promised by the company).
- Bowen, et al. v. Whirlpool Corp., et al., Case No. CV05-8067 (C.D. Cal.) (Class Counsel in nationwide class action alleging defective water heaters. Proposed nationwide class settlement pending).
- Health Science Products LLC. v. Sage Software SB, Inc., Case No. 1:05-CV-03329-RWS (N.D. Ga.) (Co-Lead class Counsel in purported nationwide class action alleging defective software).
- In re Imagitas, Inc., Drivers’ Privacy Protection Act Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1828 (M.D. Fla.) (Nominated as Co-Lead Class Counsel in Multi-District Litigation of several nationwide and statewide class actions alleging illegal disclosure and use of drivers’ personal information).
- Donna Wiatrowski et al v. Sears, Roebuck & Co at al, Case No. 1:06-CV-00637 (N.D. Ohio) (Lead Class Counsel in purported nationwide class alleging defective appliances sold to consumers).
- Oestreicher v. Alienware Corporation, Case No. 3:07-CV-00512 (N.D. Cal.) (Lead Class Counsel in purported California statewide class action alleging defectively designed/manufactured computers).
- Davis, et al. v. Dell, Inc. Case No. 1:07-CV-00630 (D. N.J.) (Co-Lead Class Counsel in purported New Jersey statewide class action alleging defectively designed/manufactured televisions).
- Schweinfurth, et al. v. Motorola, Inc. Case No. 1:05-CV-0024 (N.D. Ohio) (Co-Lead Class Counsel in purported nationwide class action alleging defective cellular phones).
|