More ETF Concerns for Investors: ETF Tracking Errors on the Rise
As if investors didn’t already have enoughreasons to steer clear of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), new data show that the funds’ average tracking errors are on the rise.
A fund’s average tracking error is the difference between its return
and its benchmark index’s return. Most ETFs (not includinginverse or leveraged ETFs) attempt to match as closely as possible the returns of their underlying
benchmarks. This means that if a particular ETF tracked the S&P 500
and the S&P 500 gained 13.4% in 2012, then a well-managed S&P
500 ETF should theoretically render an investor a return of 13.4% minus
the fund’s expense ratio. In practice, however, this isn’t
always the case.
In fact, the
average ETF’s tracking error for 2012 was 59 basis points, according to InvestmentNews. That reflects an increase from 2011, when
the average tracking error was 52 basis points.
Two of the funds with the largest tracking errors in 2012 were iShares
MSCI Emerging Markets Financials ETF (EMFN), with a tracking error of
5.3%, and Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RYU), with
a tracking error of 4.4%.
Higher than average expense ratios will necessarily translate into higher
than average tracking errors, but ETFs based on illiquid indices also
tend to have greater tracking errors than ETFs based on bigger, more liquid
indices. Investors who decide to invest in ETFs should make sure they
fully understand the products’ risks, including a particular fund’s
average historical tracking error.
Additional risks to consider before investing can be found here.
About our law firm:
Meyer Wilson represents individuals across the country who have been harmed
by investment fraud. All of our cases are handled on a contingency fee
basis and we never request a retainer of any kind. Contact us for more
information or complete the online form on the top of this page and we
will respond promptly.